Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Powell v. Shaw et al
as 3:2019cv00023
Defendant:
Mary Ann Jones, Charlis Dukes, Ruth Saucier and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Powell v. Brazos County Detention Center et al
as 4:2018cv01322
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell
Defendant:
Brazos County Detention Center and Medical Department In Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Powell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 17-1262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director Michigan Department of Corrections, K. ROXANNE MCKEE, Deputy Director, THOMAS OSIER, Assistant Mental Health Director and others
Jonathan Powell v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 16-16527
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN MICHAEL POWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
POWELL v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER et al
as 3:2016cv04428
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POWELL
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER, CHARLES ELLIS, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. State of Oregon
as 6:2016cv00528
Petitioner:
David Michael Powell
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv00072
Petitioner:
Jonathan Michael Powell
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Powell v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv01582
Petitioner:
Jonathan Michael Powell
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. USA-2255
as 1:2014cv01531
Petitioner:
Michael Powell
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Michael Powels v. Lori Gidley
as 14-1133
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL POWELS
Respondent - Appellee:
LORI GIDLEY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
