Cases 31 - 40 of 774
USA v. Michael Alford
as 23-13020
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY ALFORD
HAWKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02155
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY HAWKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01805
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clark v. Trisler et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
Michael Ray Trisler and Brian Paul Trisler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23055
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15888
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
Senn v. Lumpkin
as 23-10661
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Ray Senn
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
ABDUL-GHAFOOR, et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATOIN, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
RHODA KATHLEEN BLAIR, LINDA COHILL, GUY E. DONA and others
Defendant:
RONALD D. ROMAIN and PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
DODSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14382
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY DODSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Swanson v. Danielson
as 6:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Swanson
Defendant:
Kevin Danielson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
