Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Mullett v. Lilly et al
as 4:2023cv01270
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Mullett
Respondent:
Veronical Lilly, V. Libby and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04553
Petitioner:
Scott Michael Roberts
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kuzminski v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv01142
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Kuzminski
Respondent:
Harold Clark, Earles and O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Clark
as 1:2020cv01011
Petitioner:
Norman Michael Roberts
Respondent:
Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Robert Blackburn v. Craig Koenig
as 5:2019cv01340
Respondent:
Craig Koenig
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Hayes v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00331
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Haynes
Respondent:
Colette Peters and Jerri Taylor
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen and Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Halverson
as 0:2017cv05165
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Robinson
Defendant:
Karen Halverson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Everett v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv00877
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Everett
Respondent:
Julie Jones and Attorney General State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haynes v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Supervision et al
as 2:2016cv00128
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Haynes
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Supervision, Colette Peters and Jeri Taylor
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen, Lynn David Larsen and Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Roberts v. Randy L Tews
as 5:2016cv00026
Petitioner:
Michael Roberts
Respondent:
Randy L Tews
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
