Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ZERO GRAVITY ENTERPRISE LLC et al v. ROSALES et al
as 2:2020cv01772
Defendant:
SWISH DIGITAL LLC, MICHAEL ROSALES, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
SOCIAL CADRE, LLC, SNOW WHITE DENTAL, LLC, ZERO GRAVITY ENTERPRISE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Rosales v. Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company
as 5:2017cv00247
Plaintiff:
Michael Rosales
Defendant:
Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Rosales v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.
as 2:2014cv00101
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and Unknown Store Manager
Plaintiff:
Dennis Michael Rosales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosales v. Grounds
as 3:2013cv00404
Petitioner:
Dathan Michael Rosales
Respondent:
R. Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosales v. Howater et al
as 1:2012cv01303
Plaintiff:
Michael Rosales
Defendant:
Lonn Howater, Ray McSchooler, Officer Easley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Rosales v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director
as 09-70013
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ROSALES
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Rosales v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00072
Petitioner:
Michael Rosales and Michael Rosales
Respondent:
Nathanial Quarterman and Nathanial Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rosales v. Quarterman
as 07-70019
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ROSALES
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Huth v. Haslun et al
as 7:2007cv00152
Plaintiff:
Florence E. Huth
Defendant:
Deborah Haslun, Carlos Millan, Joseph Bloomer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
