Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Taft v. Sassman et al
as 5:2011cv04060
Plaintiff:
Dave L Taft, Jr
Defendant:
Steve Sassman, Steve McQueen and Michael Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
South v. USA
as 1:2011cv00183
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Ryan South
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Michael Ryan Larson v. Douglas Weber, et al
as 11-1650
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Ryan Larson
Respondent - Appellee:
Douglas Weber, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General
Taft v. Ryan et al
as 5:2011cv04021
Plaintiff:
David L Taft, Jr
Defendant:
Michael Ryan, Ervin Whitehead and Steve McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Weber et al
as 1:2010cv01026
Petitioner:
Michael Ryan Larson
Respondent:
Douglas Weber and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darrell Bumpas v. Metropolitan Government of Nas, et al
as 10-5514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL W. BUMPAS
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON COUNTY, FREDERICK TEAGUE, Sgt., MICHAEL RYAN, Officer and others
Ryan v. Wiley
as 1:2009cv01278
Petitioner:
Michael Ryan
Respondent:
Ron Wiley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bush v. Epps
as 4:2009cv00173
Petitioner:
Michael Ryan Bush
Respondent:
Stewart Epps
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CAPUTO v. BELMAR MUNICIPALITY & COUNTY et al
as 3:2008cv01975
Plaintiff:
VINCENT CAPUTO
Defendant:
BELMAR MUNICIPALITY & COUNTY, NEPTUNE CITY MUNICIPALITY & COUNTY, POINT PLEASANT BORO MUNICIPALITY & COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bumpas v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County et al
as 3:2007cv00766
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Bumpas
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Fredrick Teague, Michael Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
