Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Scata et al v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv00409
Plaintiff:
Jeannie Scata and Michael Scata
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United Credit Recovery, LLC v. Bexton et al
as 1:2018mc00836
Defendant:
Michael Scata, I Recovery LLC, Imperial Recovery Partners, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United Credit Recovery, LLC
United Credit Recovery, LLC v. Bexten et al
as 2:2018ms00110
Defendant:
Michael Scata, Jason Bexten, Imperial Recovery Partners, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United Credit Recovery, LLC
United Credit Recovery LLC v. Bexten et al
as 2:2018mc00063
Defendant:
Michael Scata, I Recovery LLC, Imperial Recovery Partners LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United Credit Recovery LLC
NOT USED
as 2:2018cv02215
Defendant:
Michael Scata, I Recovery LLC, Jason Bexten and others
Plaintiff:
United Credit Recovery, LLC
Scata et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 1:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
Michael Scata and Jeannie Scata
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Martin et al v. Scata et al
as 4:2012cv00447
Plaintiff:
Scott Martin and Debbie Martin
Defendant:
Michael Scata and Jeannie Scata
Counter_claimant:
Jeannie Scata and Michael Scata
Counter_defendant:
Debbie Martin and Scott Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United Credit Recovery, LLC v. Bexten et al
as 6:2011cv01714
Plaintiff:
United Credit Recovery, LLC
Defendant:
Jason Bexten , Imperial Recovery Partners, LLC , I Recovery LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker v. Regent Asset Management Solutions, et al
as 5:2011cv02335
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Tucker
Defendant:
Michael Scata and Regent Asset Management Solutions, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
