Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Kristopher Reveles v. County of Ventura et al
as 2:2017cv01066
Defendant:
County of Ventura, Geoff Dean, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kristopher R. Reveles
Schultz v. Hill
as 2:2016cv02071
Defendant:
Dawn Marie Hill
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Golden v. Fullmer et al
as 2:2016cv01162
Plaintiff:
Parish M Golden
Defendant:
Luke Fullmer , Larry Dillenberg, Benjamin Giffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kretlow, Bernard v. Schultz, Michael et al
as 3:2016cv00583
Plaintiff:
Bernard Edward Kretlow
Defendant:
Michael Schultz , Elsinger , Baumann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schultz v. D. Warden Stroud et al
as 2:2016cv01062
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D. Warden Stroud
Petitioner:
Lee Michael Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schultz v. Hill
as 2:2016cv01063
Defendant:
Dawn Marie Hill
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Schultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schultz v. Hill, et al.,
as 2:2015cv02384
Defendant:
Dawn Marie Hill, Tom Loguiduce, Lacy Clair Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Schultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schultz v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2015cv02325
Respondent:
Attorney General, D. Warden and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Lee Michael Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schultz v. N.S.D.O. Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00471
Respondent:
N.S.D.O. Corrections and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Lee Michael Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hashim v. Hamblin et al
as 2:2014cv01265
Plaintiff:
Akinbo JS Hashim
Defendant:
Gary Hamblin , Cathy A Jess, Larry L Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
