Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Tate Prows v. City of Oxford, OH, et al
as 23-3920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TATE DAVID PROWS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OXFORD, OH, CHIEF JOHN A. JONES, MICHAEL SMITH and others
Ernster v. City of Mt. Washington, KY et al
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tamara Ernster
Defendant:
City of Mt. Washington, KY, Bradley Aubin, Mark Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Haddadin et al
as 5:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Zeid Haddadin, Kyle Trsinar, Emmalee Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prows v. City of Oxford et al
as 1:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Tate Prows and Tate David Prows
Defendant:
City of Oxford, Chief John A. Jones, Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony v. Summers et al
as 2:2022cv10750
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Anthony
Defendant:
Deputy Ryan Summers, Deputy Tyler Bachman, Deouty Brian Goleniak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Patterson v. Stark County, Ohio et al
as 5:2017cv01699
Plaintiff:
James Patterson
Defendant:
Stark County, Ohio, George T. Maier, Lt. Ady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Huckaby v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2017cv02248
Plaintiff:
Amanda Huckaby
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee , Memphis Police Department, Michael Rallings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv13492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Felbarth v. East Tennessee Human Resource Agency, Inc. et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00329
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Felbarth
Defendant:
East Tennessee Human Resource Agency, Inc., Loudon County , Judy Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
