Cases 11 - 20 of 2,877
Flynn v. Weissmann et al
as 1:2024cv02409
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Flynn
Defendant:
Andrew Weissmann, NICOLLE WALLACE and MSNBC Cable L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Smalley v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Michael T Smalley
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service, United States Department of the Treasury and United States Bureau of Fiscal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Bridwell v. REV Recreation Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Bridwell
Defendant:
REV Recreation Group, Inc. doing business as Midwest Automotive Designs and Ultimate Toys, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Caraffa v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-1743
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL T. LIBURDI, DISTRICT JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON, named as U.S. District Court of AZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marilyn Eason v. Michael Casper, et al
as 24-1424
Plaintiff:
MARILYN EASON
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. CASPER and RAYMOND FRANCO
Caraffa v. Liburdi, et al.
as 24-1604
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA, on behalf of all the county inmates in the unconstitutional jurisdiction of the State of Arizona
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. LIBURDI, DISTRICT JUDGE, EILEEN S. WILLETT, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States of America and others
Moye v. Eshbach et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Moye
Defendant:
Judge David C. Eshbach and Isaiah D. Emenheiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caraffa v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-1490
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
