Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-20621
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv06083
Plaintiff:
Michelle Thomas
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Thomas v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 4:2026cv13676
Plaintiff:
Brandie Michelle Thomas
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bulldog National Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. Rawls Trucking Company, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv04865
Plaintiff:
Bulldog National Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Rawls Trucking Company, LLC, Malik Jafrance Pierre, Larry Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Thomas v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv02972
Plaintiff:
Michelle Thomas
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thomas v. Jackson Park SLF, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv05384
Plaintiff:
Michelle Thomas
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Brian Case, Jr., Darius Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daughtry v. Davis et al
as 2:2026cv00569
Plaintiff:
Melanie Daughtry
Defendant:
Cody Davis, QCHC Inc, Heather Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rieckert v. Cardoso et al
as 1:2026cv00020
Plaintiff:
Justin Rieckert
Defendant:
Jeanal Cardoso, Jericho Curtis, Jonathan Olivares and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES v. CALHOUN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 5:2025cv00309
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L JONES
Defendant:
CALHOUN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, DARRYL O'BRYAN, CHAD BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
