Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Miller et al v. Kamp et al
as 0:2019cv00092
Plaintiff:
Mickey Miller and Cynthia Miller
Defendant:
David S. Kamp and Aaron Kamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Armark LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01153
Plaintiff:
Mickey Miller
Defendant:
Armark LLC, Aramark Food Service, Supervisor Lenord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Schmaling et al
as 2:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
Mickey Miller
Defendant:
Sheriff Schmaling, Captain Wearing, Lt Friend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickey Miller v. Michael Ninkovic, et al
as 17-1937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICKEY MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL NINKOVIC, DEVONTA TOWNES, BRIAN CAPAK and others
John Lankford v. City of Hendersonville, TN, et al
as 15-5561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PIERCE LANKFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HENDERSONVILLE, TENNESSEE, HENDERSONVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, R. ABEL, (CC #376) Former Hendersonville Police Officer and others
Mickey Miller v. Aramark Food Service, et al
as 15-2086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICKEY MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE and JANE DOE, sued as Nurse Jane Doe
Lankford v. City of Hendersonville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
John Pierce Lankford
Defendant:
City of Hendersonville, Tennessee, Hendersonville Police Department, R. Abel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Municipal Goverment of the City of Hendersonville, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Yarnell Malone
Defendant:
Municipal Goverment of the City of Hendersonville, Tennessee, Mickey Miller, Robert Fohrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers et al v. Jim Burke Automotive
as 2:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
James E. Bowers and Mickey Miller
Defendant:
Jim Burke Automotive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Briggs et al
as 2:2014cv01602
Plaintiff:
Mickey Miller
Defendant:
Lt Briggs , Lt Finkley, CO Wilbourn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
