Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Kutt v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Mers Kutt
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Samsung Electronics Company Ltd., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kutt v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Mers Kutt
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Samsung Electronics Company Ltd., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Mira Advanced Technology Systems, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Mira Advanced Technology Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. John Does 1-2
as 1:2016cv00993
Plaintiff:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Defendant:
John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Bates v. Nivtendo of America Inc. et al. et al
as 1:2016cv01341
Plaintiff:
Marlow L. Bates, Sr.
Defendant:
Nivtendo of America Inc. et al. and Microsoft Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Kutt v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00640
Plaintiff:
Mers Kutt
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Samsung Electronics Company, LTD., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2056
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Windy City Innovations, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2015cv00103
Plaintiff:
Windy City Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Microsoft Corporation v. John Does 1, et al.
as 1:2015cv00240
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation and FS-ISAC, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Microsoft Corporation v. Scott et al
as 8:2014cv03332
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation
Defendant:
Christopher Scott and PC Retro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
