Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Adams v. GEO Group, et al
as 22-6120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL ADRIAN ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
THE GEO GROUP, INC., individual and official capacity; Owner, MARK BOWEN, individual and official capacity; Warden, FNU SMITH, individual and official capacity; Nurse and others
Adams v. The Geo Group Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Miguel Adrian Adams
Defendant:
The Geo Group Inc, Mark Bowen, FNU Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams et al v. The Geo Group Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Joedell Robert Perkins and Miguel Adrian Adams
Defendant:
Lawton Correctional Facility, Mr Bowden and The Geo Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Eccles et al
as 5:2020cv01185
Defendant:
Evertt Shea, Michal Eccles, Kelsey Knight and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Adrian Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adames v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv09546
Plaintiff:
Miguel A Adames
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ADAME v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv03618
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL D ADAME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adame-Rodriguez v. Butler et al
as 3:2017cv00611
Plaintiff:
Miguel Andrew Adame-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Virginia Butler , John Woodrum , Joshua Hein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Miguel Alvarez-Adame
as 13-50073
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL ALVAREZ-ADAME
Alvarez-Adame v. USA
as 3:2012cv01875
Plaintiff:
Miguel Alvarez-Adame
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Miguel Alvarez
as 11-56728
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL ADAME ALVAREZ, AKA Miguel Adame-Alvarez, AKA Miguel Alvarez-Adame, AKA Manuel Uribe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
