Cases 1 - 10 of 87
United States v. Miguel Silva-Torres, Jr.
as 24-1766
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Miguel Silva-Torres, Jr.
Gomez-Torres v. Garland
as 24-484
Petitioner:
MIGUEL GOMEZ-TORRES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Torres-Torres et al v. Hospital Metropolitano San German et al
as 3:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
JOSE MIGUEL TORRES-TORRES, ROSA HILDA TORRES-RODRIGUEZ and J O T-C
Defendant:
Hospital Metropolitano San German, Metro Health, Inc., Hospital Metropolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
MEDINA-TORRES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02874
Plaintiff:
JUAN MIGUEL MEDINA-TORRES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TORRES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22172
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL EUGENE TORRES, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Torres v. Tyson Farms, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Juan Miguel Sosa Torres
Defendant:
Tyson Farms, Inc., Goodgame Company, Inc., MSE Building Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mendoza-Torres v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
Miguel Mendoza-Torres
Defendant:
DeWayne Hendrix, FCI Sheridan and Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza-Torres v. Hendrix
as 3:2022cv00824
Plaintiff:
Miguel Mendoza-Torres
Defendant:
DeWayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
