Cases 1 - 10 of 23
PADILLA v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05083
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL PADILLA
Defendant:
JOHN E WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PADILLA v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01572
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL PADILLA
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Amy Thomas-Lawson, et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services
as 21-55459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMY THOMAS-LAWSON, WILLIAM GREEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, MIGUEL PADILLA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Thomas-Lawson et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
as 2:2020cv07301
Plaintiff:
Amy Thomas-Lawson, William Green, Miguel Padilla and others
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Miguel Padilla v. Andrew Saul
as 20-15787
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL PADILLA
Thomas-Lawson et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
as 1:2019cv03567
Plaintiff:
Amy Thomas-Lawson, William Green, Miguel Padilla and others
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Munoz et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11781
Plaintiff:
Herminio Platas, Anthony Olivet, John J Owens and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Miguel Padilla v. Nancy C. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv06123
Plaintiff:
Miguel Padilla
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv07366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miguel A. Padilla v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2017cv08196
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, DOES 1 through 10, inclsuive and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Miguel Padilla and Miguel A. Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
