Cases 1 - 10 of 417
SAMUELS v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05416
Petitioner:
MILTON SAMUELS
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MILTON v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04983
Petitioner:
SAMUELS MILTON
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Grayson v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
Milton D. Grayson, Jr.
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grayson v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00127
Petitioner:
Milton D Grayson, Jr
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smiley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Milton Smiley
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMILEY v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
MILTON SMILEY
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milton v. Valley
as 1:2023cv00520
Petitioner:
Bishop Patrick Michael Milton
Defendant:
Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milton v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv03080
Plaintiff:
Steve Milton
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaca Sosa v. Leu et al
as 3:2023cv00539
Petitioner:
Milton Eduardo Vaca Sosa
Respondent:
D. Leu, Colette Peters and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Milton v. Stover
as 3:2023cv01027
Petitioner:
Kevin Milton
Respondent:
Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
