Cases 11 - 20 of 1,711
Coffman v. Officials/Staff of TDCJ Hughes Unit
as 6:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Officials/Staff of TDCJ Hughes Unit, Warden Gene Miller, James M. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milton Anderson v. L. Roman, et al
as 24-1260
Plaintiff:
MILTON ANDERSON
Defendant:
L. ROMAN and THOMAS J. DART
Smiley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Milton Smiley
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMILEY v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
MILTON SMILEY
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patrick McIntosh v. Unknown Charleston County Sheriff's Deputies, et al
as 24-10408
Plaintiff:
PATRICK RANDALL MCINTOSH
Defendant:
UNKNOWN CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES, UNKNOWN CITY OF CHARLESTON POLICE OFFICERS ET.AL, SHERRI A. BROWN and others
Johnson v. Georgia Department of Corrections (G.D.C.) et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Milton Kent Johnson
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Correction (G.D.C.), Jane Doe, Sergeant Mrs. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavarria v. USA
as 3:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Milton Chavarria
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bates v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Milton Bates
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Timothy Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LANE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
MILTON LEWIS LANE, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jallow v. Geffner et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Yaya Jallow
Defendant:
Edward I. Geffner, Leticia Randle, Robert Lashley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
