Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Lee v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 4:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Sheila Lee
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, M O'hara, Officer Rodiguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2023cv00743
Plaintiff:
Sheila Lee
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, M O'hara, Officer Rodiguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingle v. Khan et al
as 5:2019cv00129
Defendant:
Patricia Ellen Watson Dingle, Allen Kerr, Joseph N. Calloway and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Dingle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
GRAHAM v. CHAVIS et al
as 1:2018cv00947
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP JOHN GRAHAM
Defendant:
OFC. BROCK, SGT LAUREL CHAVIS, DANA BEATHEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. CHAVIS et al
as 1:2018cv00697
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFC. BROCK, SGT LAUREL CHAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP JOHN GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASALAAM v. HUDSON et al
as 1:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
SULYAMAN AL ISLAM WASALAAM
Defendant:
STEPHANIE HUDSON, TUCK, BARBARA BRITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Trump et al
as 5:2017ct03060
Defendant:
Trump, Mitch McConnell, Governor of Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
Banks and Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLACKMON v. WOODS et al
as 1:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DEVON BLACKMON
Defendant:
MICHEAL WOODS, MITCH WOODS and RALPH KERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
