Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Mixson v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00242
Petitioner:
Rondall Clyde Mixson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mixson v. Thompson et al
as 3:2024cv01299
Plaintiff:
James E. Mixson, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Lamar Thompson and Panther II Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Mixson v. Louisiana Horticulture Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Angele Mixson
Defendant:
Louisiana Horticulture Commission, Rob Barry, III, George Bofinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglas v. Mixson et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Darren Douglas
Defendant:
W. Mixson, T. Johnson and STATEFARM Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rondall Mixson v. Warden Janson
as 23-6897
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONDALL CLYDE MIXSON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN JANSON
Mixson v. J.B. Hunt Transport Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03633
Plaintiff:
Richard Mixson
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport Inc. and Christoph Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 md Diversity-Motor Vehicle/Wrongful Death
Mixson v. Warden Janson
as 2:2023cv01618
Petitioner:
Rondall Clyde Mixson
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mixon v. USA
as 7:2022cv81508
Petitioner:
Rondall Clyde Mixson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nicholas et al v. Deutsche Bank AG
as 1:2022cv03032
Plaintiff:
Martin Nicholas, John Trott and Christopher James Smith
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank AG
Petitioner:
Bondurant Mixson & Elmore LLP
Nicholas et al v. Deutsche Bank AG
as 1:2022mi00039
Plaintiff:
Martin Nicholas, John Trott and Christopher James Smith
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank AG
Petitioner:
Bondurant Mixson & Elmore LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
