Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Michael Jones v. Salam Syed, et al
as 19-3064
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL JONES
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN DOE, Radiologist, SALAM SYED, Doctor, MEREDITH MASHAK and others
Sharber v. Bolton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00526
Plaintiff: Darryn Brett Sharber
Defendant: Mark Bolton, City of Louisville, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv10769
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Mobilex USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00006
Plaintiff: Joseph Cox, Jr
Defendant: Mobilex USA and Elliot Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv14287
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Radford v. Dunn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00396
Plaintiff: Thomas Radford
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bentley, Robert Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA, et al v. Symphony Diagnostic Services,, et al
as 14-3897
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN P. MCDONOUGH
Defendant - Appellee: SYMPHONY DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, INC. and SYMPHONY DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES NO. 1, dba Mobilex USA
KULP v. MOBILEX USA et al
as 5:2012cv03816
Plaintiff: EDWARD KULP
Defendant: MOBILEX USA and THE GUARDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2414
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv03606
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?