Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Montes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2026cv02273
Plaintiff:
Liliana Montes
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-6805
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Frank Monte, III
as 26-2872
Petitioner:
In re: FRANK MICHAEL MONTE, III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, `, MARQUIS JOHNSON, Director, KINTOCK RESIDENTIAL REENTRY CENTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Vega v. Walmart Stores Texas, LLC
as 4:2026cv05886
Plaintiff:
Maria Montes Vega
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05200
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04706
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
The Hanover Insurance Company v. Pearland Acres, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00240
Plaintiff:
The Hanover Insurance Company
Defendant:
PEARLAND ACRES, LLC, Diana Montes and David Cano, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
