Cases 1 - 10 of 79
MCGILL v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MONTGOMERY v. BLUE et al
as 1:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
TEON BLUE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wagner et al
as 5:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Wagner, FNU Smith, FNU Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
LISA MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KING v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR et al
as 1:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
ROY KING
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR and TAX ASSESSMENT OFFICE OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simpson v. Carothers Holding Company,LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Hubert Simpson, Lynda Mason, Allison Montgomery and others
Defendant:
Carothers Holding Company, LLC, StoneMor GP, LLC, StoneMor North Carolina, LLC and others
Montgomery v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023ct03116
Plaintiff:
Harold Montgomery
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Genna D. Petre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wilhelms v. Montgomery County Jail
as 5:2023ct03036
Plaintiff:
Brian Wilhelms
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
