Cases 41 - 50 of 1,476
Maxey v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03491
Plaintiff:
LaMarr Maxey
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Alfonso C David, Dr Burrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redmond v. House of Monty Holly Hill LLC
as 1:2023cv07549
Plaintiff:
JANE REDMOND
Defendant:
HOUSE OF MONTY HOLLY HILL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
MONTIE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27096
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MONTIE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
OTWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20990
Plaintiff:
MONTY OTWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BURNHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18132
Plaintiff:
MR BURNHAM and MONTY BURNHAM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
VIKDAL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07218
Plaintiff:
MONTY VIKDAL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Horton v. Tayloe, et al
as 23-6139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN D. HORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD EMMITT TAYLOE, MICHAEL CHARLES FLANAGAN, GERLAD FRANK NEUWIRTH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
