Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Northport Health Services of Arkansas, LLC et al v. Watts et al
as 2:2019cv02061
Plaintiff:
NHS Management, LLC, Northport Health Services, Inc., Northport Health Services of Arkansas, LLC and others
Defendant:
Lynn J. Watts and Monty L. Watts
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Bland v. Lyle et al
as 5:2019cv05053
Defendant:
Chris Olson, City of Pea Ridge, Arkansas, Eric Lyle and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer J. Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burchfield v. Harrelson et al
as 4:2016cv04050
Plaintiff:
Bradley Craig Burchfield
Defendant:
Jeff Harrelson, Monty Woods, Bryan Chesshir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spurgeon v. Washington County Detention Center et al
as 5:2013cv05289
Plaintiff:
Montie L. Spurgeon
Defendant:
Muggey, Sorrel, McGual and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abeyta-Fry v. Lee et al
as 5:2013cv05207
Plaintiff:
Monty Dorian Abeyta-Fry
Defendant:
Kao Lee, Tim Helder, Amy Driver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abeyta-Fry v. Helder et al
as 5:2013cv05167
Plaintiff:
Monty Dorian Abeyta-Fry
Defendant:
Tim Helder and Rhonda Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03059
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Movant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilmoth v. Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
as 5:2010cv05210
Plaintiff:
Monty Wilmoth
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Interim Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stidam v. Huskins et al
as 5:2009cv05104
Defendant:
Huskins, Hunter Petray and Morrison
Plaintiff:
Monty Lee Stidam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
