Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mumma v. Morgan et al
as 1:2020cv00458
Defendant:
OldCastle, George Hadley, Ronald Katzman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Mumma, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Daugherty, et al v. Joel Adams, et al
as 20-1446
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT J. BOBACK, JOEL P. ADAMS, JOHN C. HANSBERRY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. DAUGHERTY and LABMD INC
Freeman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank and Co. et al
as 1:2020cv00087
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank and Co., Cliff Pointe, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
William R. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MISSOURI v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2019cv06153
Defendant:
MORGAN & LEWIS, LLP, MORGAN LEWIS and BARBARA A. FITZGERALD
Plaintiff:
LIONEL J. MISSOURI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pimentel v. Schwenker
as 19-2510
Defendant / Appellee:
Clifford Schwenker, individually, Marcy J. Davidson, individually, Bill Ittounas, individually and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nicholas Pimentel
Pimentel v. Schwenker et al
as 1:2019cv01881
Defendant:
Jones & Jones, Inc., Charlotte Ling, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Pimentel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pimentel v. Schwenker et al
as 1:2019cv01346
Defendant:
Ira Rosenstein, Jones & Jones, Inc., Charlotte Ling and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Pimentel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Buhannic v. American Arbitrage Association (AAA) et al
as 1:2018cv02430
Plaintiff:
Philippe Buhannic and Patrick Buhannic
Defendant:
Bruce Rosenthal, American Arbitrage Association (AAA), Technology Crossover Ventures (TCV) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ri Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
