Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McQuirter et al v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2021cv01724
Plaintiff:
Joseph McQuirter and Joseph L. McQuirter, DDS, Inc.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Morton Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
McQuirter et al v. CSCR, et al
as 2:2021at00888
Plaintiff:
Joseph McQuirter and Joseph L. McQuirter, DDS, Inc.
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Morton Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Joseph McQuirter et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv04423
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and DDS Morton Rosenberg
Plaintiff:
Joseph McQuirter and Joseph L McQuirter
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Casa De Maryland, Inc. et al v. Wolf et al
as 8:2020cv02118
Plaintiff:
Oasis Legal Services, Pangea Legal Services, Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Chad F. Wolf
Amicus Curiae:
KIND (Kids In Need of Defense), Morton Rosenberg, Oxfam America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
The City of Seattle et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2019cv07151
Plaintiff:
The City of Seattle, OneAmerica, Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth Cuccinelli, Secretary USDHS Kevin McAleenan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Morton Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
L.M.-M. et al v. CUCCINELLI et al
as 1:2019cv02676
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff:
V.M.-M., REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES, S.G.-C. and others
Amicus Curiae:
MORTON ROSENBERG
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
La Clinica De La Raza et al v. Trump et al
as 4:2019cv04980
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Maternal and Child Health Access, Central American Resource Center, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), MinKwon Center for Community Action and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
David Codrea, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 19-5044
Defendant / Appellee:
William P. Barr, in his official as Attorney General and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Scott Heuman, Owen Monroe and David Codrea
Amicus Curiae:
Erwin Chemerinsky, Victoria Nourse, Jed Shugerman and others
Damien Guedes, et al v. ATF, et al
as 19-5042
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., CA 18-3083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Florida Carry, Inc., Firearms Policy Foundation, Madison Society Foundation, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas E. Brandon, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States of America, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
Erwin Chemerinsky, Victoria Nourse, Jed Shugerman and others
Firearms Policy Coalition, In, et al v. ATF, et al
as 19-5043
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas E. Brandon, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Damien Guedes, Firearms Policy Foundation, Madison Society Foundation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., CA 18-3083
Amicus Curiae:
Erwin Chemerinsky, Victoria Nourse, Jed Shugerman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
