Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Powell v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2022ct03052
Plaintiff:
Raphael Davonne Powell
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, AUSP Thomson Administration, Mr. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden, DEAN LOCKLEAR, Associate Warden, Scotland Correctional Institute, MS. S. BRADDY, Case Manager, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
MEYERS v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MR. JACOBS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. S. BRADDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2021cv50393
Plaintiff:
Mario Anton Lee
Defendant:
Andrew Ciolli, Mr. Graham and Ms. Smiddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonham v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01833
Plaintiff:
Bryan P. Bonham
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Barbara K. Cegavske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell J. Mickell v. Bryan Stirling
as 17-6282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL J. MICKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN STIRLING, C. REYNOLDS, MR. DAVIS and others
Harris v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Damecha Harris
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello, Mr. Miller, R. Humphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rider v. Tristan et al
as 2:2016cv02633
Defendant:
S Barrett, Mr Gordon, Mr Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Rider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Houser et al
as 2:2016cv03251
Plaintiff:
Dexaviar Fields
Defendant:
J R Houser, Sr, T Riley and Mr Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickell v. Stirling et al
as 6:2015cv04656
Plaintiff:
Darrell J Mickell
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling , C Reynolds , Mr Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
