Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mott v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Nathan Mott
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Assistant Warden John Doe, Mr. Blanks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mott v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nathan Mott and Carl Lynch
Defendant:
John Doe, Mr. Blanks, Knotts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mott v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nathan Mott and Carl Lynch
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Assistant Warden John Doe, Mr. Blanks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mott v. Doe et al
as 7:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Nathan Mott and Carl Lynch
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Assistant Warden John Doe, Mr. Blanks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson v. Barnes et al
as 4:2020cv04474
Defendant:
Ms. Ramsey, Medical Mrs. Brock, Warden Ms. Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Seelig v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 19-6445
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. STREETER, MR. HARVEY, LIEUTENANT HALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL E. SEELIG
Seelig v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2018ct03206
Defendant:
Ms. Hawkins, Ms. West, Mr. Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Seelig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seelig v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2018ct03189
Defendant:
Mr. Stocks, Mr. Dawson, Mr. Hunter and others
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Seelig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Clarke et al
as 2:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Karim A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David Zook, Natarcha Gregg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Satans Kidnappers and Aiders et al
as 6:2015cv04966
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Satans Kidnappers and Aiders, Ms Harris, Mr Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
