Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Dixon v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Dashawn Tyreek Dixon
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Demetrius Glenn v. Adam Ruffin
as 23-6034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS GLENN
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM RUFFIN, Attorney, MICHAEL HENTHORNE, Attorney, MS. WILLIAMS, Lt SCDC and others
Hammons v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00164
Petitioner:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01013
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jeremiah Farmer v. BOP Director
as 22-6365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS DIRECTOR, REGIONAL, WARDEN, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON and others
David Meyers v. Angela Wethington
as 21-7699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA WETHINGTON, PREA Manager-Oerations Manager, HARVEY SPENCER, SXI-Chief Secretary, GREGORY HOLLOWAY, Eastern Regional Operations Manager and others
Adam Pelletier v. Marcus Elam
as 21-7043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM PELLETIER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator, BETH CABEL, Warden Sussex II and MR. BROWN, Hearing Officer for Sussex II
Banks v. Brown et al
as 1:2021cv00021
Defendant:
Mrs. Brown, Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Dudely and others
Plaintiff:
Maunta Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Wethington et al
as 2:2021cv00008
Defendant:
E.P. Witt, Ms. Ansar, Dr. Eric Van Buskirk and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Joseph Walters, QMHP - Ms. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
