Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jones v. Thornton, et al
as 7:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Mr. Antonio Trey Jones and Antonio Trey Jones
Defendant:
Mr. James Haywood Thornton, Mr. William T Brady, Andrew Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
FAROOK v. DAVIS
as 1:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
KHALIL A. FAROOK and DONALD MILLER
Defendant:
MR. JAMES RUSTIN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MOORE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE/DEPT., BILL FLINT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. SCHMIDT et al
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
ALLISON COOK
Defendant:
JUSTIN JUICE SCHMIDT, MISS JANICE and MR. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FULLARD v. UNKNOWN AGENTS/EMPLOYEE JAILER SHERIFFS UNNAMED EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2021cv00302
Defendant:
OFFICER BROWN, UNKNOWN AGENTS/EMPLOYEE JAILER SHERIFFS UNNAMED EMPLOYEES, MS. NANCY SEALS and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD FULLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar et al v. Fields et al
as 7:2020cv00195
Plaintiff:
J C-H, Ms. Luz Huerta Salazar, Mr. Jose F Toribio and others
Defendant:
Mr. James Russell Fields, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
WILSON v. PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA et al
as 1:2020cv00432
Defendant:
MINISTRY OF CIVIL AFFAIRS OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA, WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY, PEOPLES GOVERNMENT OF THE CITY OF WUHAN and others
Plaintiff:
MR. JAMES BARRETT WILSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craig v. Duke Energy Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv00461
Plaintiff:
James A. Craig
Defendant:
Duke Energy Corporation, Mr. James E. Rogers, Ann Maynard Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
