Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Clark v. McFarlene et al
as 3:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Major Anthony Clark
Defendant:
Andrew McFarlene, Lt. Griffin, Cert Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. MacFarlene et al
as 3:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Major Anthony Clark
Defendant:
Andrew MacFarlene, Mrs. Griffin, Mr. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANNING v. ST. PAUL et al
as 2:2020cv14240
Defendant:
SCO. MR. RIVERA, SGT. ST. PAUL and SCO. MR. SANTIAGO
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MANNING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago et al v. Costco Wholesale Corp. et al
as 3:2019cv01082
Plaintiff:
Victoria Santiago, Mr. Rivera and Ms. Santiago conjugal partnership, Reynaldo Rivera and others
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP, ET AL, Insurance Company B, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz v. MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2017cv03768
Plaintiff:
Roberto Diaz
Defendant:
MDC Brooklyn and Mrs. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marino et al v. Saad et al
as 5:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Vincent Michael Marino and Juan Carlos Ortiz-Abreu
Defendant:
Jennifer Saad, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Squires and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arango v. Slocum et al
as 3:2014cv00570
Plaintiff:
Maximo Ramos Arango
Defendant:
Mr. Slocum, Mr. Harris, Mr. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeil v. Rivera
as 1:2013cv04578
Petitioner:
Babu McNeil
Respondent:
Mr. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antrobus v. Hane
as 13-2350
Petitioner - Appellant:
Andre Antrobus
Defendant - Appellee:
Mr. Rivera, Chris, ADA, Lawrence Wright and others
Andre Antrobus v. Hanes et al
as 1:2013cv02742
Petitioner:
Andre Antrobus
Respondent:
Chris, Chris Eribo, Charles Hanes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
