Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Todd Ishee
as 22-7084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, KENNETH E. LASSITER, EDDIE THOMAS and others
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Todd Ishee
as 22-7066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, KENNETH E. LASSITER, EDDIE THOMAS and others
David Perry v. Dr. Cuitillar
as 22-6284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID DWAYNE PERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. CUITILLAR, MD, MRS. WIGGINS, Counselor, DR. NOGO, MD and others
Perry v. Cuitillar et al
as 5:2021ct03307
Plaintiff:
David Dwayne Perry
Defendant:
Dr. MD Cuitillar, Mrs. Wiggins, Dr. Nogo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gould v. Ishee et al
as 5:2021ct03053
Defendant:
Eddie Thomas, Mr. Wiggins, Todd E. Ishee and others
Plaintiff:
Abdu-Salim Gould
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Cullison v. Mr. Johnson
as 20-7457
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. WIGGINS, Mental Health and MR. JOHNSON, Mental Health Psychiatrist
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON JOSEPH CULLISON
Cullison v. Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv00578
Defendant:
Mr. Johnson and Mr. Wiggins
Plaintiff:
Aaron Joseph Cullison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The Hon. Warrant Issuing Judge et al
as 5:2020ct03064
Defendant:
Patterson, Judge Charles J. Siragusa, M.C.J. Lt. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Warden J. C. Holland, Dr. Gillespie Wadsworth and Counselor Mrs. Wiggins
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Joyner et al
as 6:2017cv01654
Plaintiff:
Jerome Eugene Todd
Defendant:
H. Joyner, Mr Wiggins, R Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Wadsworth et al
as 5:2016ct03302
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Gillespie Wadsworth, Mrs. Wiggins and J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
