Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Scott v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00026
Plaintiff:
James R. Scott and James R. Chapman
Defendant:
Mr. McClain, Ms. C. Jones, Chatham County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Officer White, Chatham County Detention Center, Mr. Mclain and others
Plaintiff:
Joh'mz Mikhal Ransom and Jah'mz Mikhal Ransom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Motley
as 2:2020cv01194
Defendant:
Motley, Mr. Motley, CAPS Downtown Birmingham and others
Plaintiff:
Miss DeKorrie K Bell and DeKorrie K Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOODY v. EDELEN et al
as 4:2020cv00237
Defendant:
MR KING, BRYANT GOODWIN and CHRISTOPHER EDELEN
Plaintiff:
JESSE EDWARD MOODY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Bateman et al
as 6:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant:
Jakelia Bateman, Mrs. Brown, Mario Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Stewart
as 1:2014cv00433
Plaintiff:
Darius Miles Hicks
Defendant:
Cynthia D. Stewart, Derrick J. Lee, Mrs. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze, Mrs. Wilson, Mrs. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bullock v. Jones, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00966
Plaintiff:
Maurice Bullock
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Captain Jenkins, Sgt. Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
Carl Humphrey, Doug Underwood, Danny Piland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00366
Plaintiff:
Romeo Ward
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Mr. King and S. M. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
