Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Brown v. Clark et al
as 1:2026cv01183
Plaintiff:
Enrico E. M. Brown
Defendant:
Terrence Clark, Ms. Pearl, Mr. Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Samuel Caughron
as 26-6321
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
SAMUEL CAUGHRON, W.R.S.P. Unit Manager, MICHAEL POZEG, J. ARTRIP and others
David Meyers v. Abigail Spanberger
as 26-6285
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
ABIGAIL SPANBERGER, Governor of Virginia, JOSEPH WALTERS, WARDEN D. ZOOK and others
David Meyers v. David Rose
as 26-6239
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DAVID ROSE, Operations Manager of Wallens Ridge State Prison, C. VIBRANT, Grievance Coordinator of Wallens Ridge State Prison, T. FLEMING, Grievance Coordinator Assistant of Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Wells v. Wiliams et al
as 3:2026cv00008
Plaintiff:
Mitchell W. Wells
Defendant:
Ms. Williams, Nurse, Ms. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siplen v. Brame et al
as 5:2025ct03299
Plaintiff:
Suzette Siplen
Defendant:
Curtis Brame, Major Patrina, Dr. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Caughron et al
as 7:2025cv00639
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Samuel Caughron, Michael Pozeg, J. Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Rose et al
as 7:2025cv00555
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
David Rose, C. Viibrant, T. Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Youngkin et al
as 7:2025cv00542
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Glen Youngkin, Chadwick Dotson, Warden D. Zook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker et al v. Oliver et al
as 1:2025cv03898
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Gregory Dozier, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.