Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolverton v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01760
Plaintiff:
Ira Wolverton
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Jeff Mustard, Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mustard et al v. Ducky Recovery
as 4:2023cv03367
Plaintiff:
Dennis Mustard and Darlene Mustard
Defendant:
Ducky Recovery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Jackson v. Bowen et al
as 4:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Clifford D. Jackson, III
Defendant:
Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr., ODRC Director Annette Chambers Smith, Jeff Mustard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Mustard v. Unanimous AI, Inc.
as 5:2021cv07746
Plaintiff:
Amanda Mustard
Defendant:
Unanimous AI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mustard v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2021pq01013
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
George Mustard
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MUSTARD et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A. MUSTARD, WILLIAM CURTIS WILDER, SUSANNE CERAGIOLI and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
