Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Morris v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2020cv09314
Defendant:
CO JOHN QUAYAM, DOC CHIEF OF DEPARTM HAZEL JENNINGS, CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
JOMONNI MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Hunter v. United States Goverment et al
as 0:2020cv02695
Defendant:
N. Rosario, FCI Bennettsville, S. Slone and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Anthony Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mauro Hernandez v. B. Meeks
as 19-6392
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, NP, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, L. SANCHEZ, HIT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURO GOROSTIETA HERNANDEZ
Hernandez v. Meeks et al
as 2:2018cv00661
Plaintiff:
Mauro Gorostieta Hernandez
Defendant:
B J Meeks, Stephen Hoey, L Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv00209
Petitioner:
Gerardo N. Rosario
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gerardo Rosario v. Billy Blakely, et al
as 13-10461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERARDO N. ROSARIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY BLAKELY, JASON T. SMITH, a.k.a. Jason Smith, SANDRA ROBERTS and others
Gerardo Rosario v. Billy Blakely, et al
as 12-14609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERARDO N. ROSARIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY BLAKELY and JASON T. SMITH, a.k.a. Jason Smith
Plaintiff:
SERVICE
Rosario v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2012cv00071
Petitioner:
John N Rosario
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cosgrove v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
Charles Cosgrove
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, S. Sloan, P. Runyon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
US v. Marti-Lon
as 07-1136
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ROSARIO MARTI-LON, t/n Rosario de los Angeles Marti-Lon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
