Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Caudill et al v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company
as 0:2004cv00229
Plaintiff: Ernest Peters, Loyd Caudill, Benjamin Christian and others
Executor: Cynthia Toby, Shirley McConnell, James E. Troxler and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Kentucky Employers' Mutual Insurance
Defendant: E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03282
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03281
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03276
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03287
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stone et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13713
Plaintiff: Nancy Stone and James Stone
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01477
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stone et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01387
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Development Center Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff: Robert Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Nancy Stone
as 13-35691
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: NANCY STONE
Stone v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02217
Petitioner: Nancy Stone
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?