Cases 1 - 10 of 27
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30246
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Isaac Wilson
as 21-4369
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ISAAC NATHANIEL WILSON
Wilson v. Berkeley County et al
as 2:2020cv03567
Defendant:
Berkeley County and City of Hanahan Police Department
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Nathaniel Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv83706
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv82696
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv34171
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TEVIN NATHANIEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv07172
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRITTENDEN et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03249
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RANEY, MICHAEL WHIDDON, DONALD JONES and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crittenden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02220
Plaintiff:
Christopher Raney, Michael Whiddon, Donald Jones and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
FENNELL et al v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
TERRELL BERKLEY, KENNETH SERNOBLE, GABRIEL LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GOLDY, LIEUTENANT HENNINGER, CAPTAIN MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
