Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Capen, et al v. Campbell
as 24-1061
Plaintiff: JOSEPH R. CAPEN and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS
Defendant: ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party: BRADY, MARCH FOR OUR LIVES, GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and others
Texas Gun Rights v. Bureau of Alcohol
as 23-11204
Plaintiff / Appellee: Texas Gun Rights, Incorporated and National Association for Gun Rights, Incorporated
Defendant / Appellant: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Donk, et al v. Grisham, et al
as 23-2185
Plaintiff / Appellant: RANDY DONK, GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC. and GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION
Plaintiff: WE THE PATRIOTS, INC., DENNIS SMITH, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS and others
Defendant / Appellee: MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM, in her official capacity only, PATRICK M. ALLEN, in his official capacity only, JASON R. BOWIE, in his official capacity only and others
We The Patriots USA, INC. et al v. Grisham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00773
Plaintiff: We The Patriots USA, INC., Dennis Smith, National Association for Gun Rights and others
Defendant: Michelle Lujan Grisham, Patrick M. Allen, Jason R. Bowie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
National Association for Gun Rights et al v. Grisham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00771
Plaintiff: National Association for Gun Rights and Foster Allen Haines
Defendant: Michelle Lujan Grisham and Patrick M. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
National Association for Gun Rights v. Lamont
as 23-1162
Plaintiff: Patricia Brought
Plaintiff / Appellant: National Association for Gun Rights and Toni Theresa Spera Flanigan
Defendant / Appellee: Ned Lamont, in his official capacity as the Governor of the State of Connecticut, Patrick J. Griffin, in his official capacity as the Chief States Attorney of the State of Connecticut and Sharmese L. Walcott, in her official capacity as the States's Attorney, Hartford Judicial District
Defendant: David R. Shannon, in his official capacity as the State's Attorney, Lichfield Judicial District
National Association For Gun Rights, Inc., et al v. City of San Jose, et al
as 23-16091
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, INC., a nonprofit corporation, MARK SIKES, HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF SAN JOSE, a public entity, JENNIFER MAGUIRE, in her official capacity an City Manager of the City of San Jose and CITY OF SAN JOSE CITY COUNCIL
Wolford et al v. Lopez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00265
Plaintiff: Jason Wolford, Alison Wolford, Atom Kasprzycki and others
Defendant: Anne E. Lopez and Maui County
Amicus Curiae: California Rifle & Pistol Association, Incorporated, Gun Owners of California, Second Amendment Law Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Texas Gun Rights, Inc et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
as 4:2023cv00578
Plaintiff: Texas Gun Rights, Inc and National Association for Gun Rights Inc.
Defendant: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners et al v. Town of Superior, The et al
as 1:2022cv02680
Plaintiff: Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, National Association for Gun Rights, Charles Bradley Walker and others
Defendant: Town of Superior, The, City of Louisville, Colorado, City of Boulder, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?