Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Afshin Bahrampour v. National Security Agency
as 24-1202
Plaintiff:
AFSHIN BAHRAMPOUR
Defendant:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Emesowum v. National Security Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Benedict Emesowum
Defendant:
National Security Agency and Paula A. Gill
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Demitry v. United States Air Force et al
as 1:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Christopher Demitry
Defendant:
United States Air Force, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and National Security Agency (NSA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ellis v. National Security Agency et al
as 1:2022cv01423
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Ellis
Defendant:
National Security Agency, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense Office of Inspector General and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Taylor v. National Security Agency et al
as 5:2022ct03351
Plaintiff:
Michael Taylor
Defendant:
National Security Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ronald Emrit v. National Security Agency
as 22-1355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1342
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Emrit v. National Security Agency (NSA)
as 1:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
National Security Agency (NSA)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Emrit v. National Security Agency
as 1:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
