Cases 21 - 30 of 201
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv01024
Plaintiff:
DA'QUAHN A. ROBERTS
Defendant:
MARCUS SCOTT, VALRIS JERNIGAN, FNU WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shulman v. Olson-Boseman et al
as 7:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Neal Shulman
Defendant:
Julia Olson-Boseman, Deb Hays, Bill Rivenbark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Neal v. Frett et al
as 5:2022ct03359
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal
Defendant:
Carlin R. Frett and Dr. James D. Engleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
HARDIN v. PEAKE et al
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, OFFICER WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Vaughan
as 5:2022ct03222
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neal
Defendant:
Warden James Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Latarish Neal
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Thomas et al
as 5:2022ct03132
Plaintiff:
Darius Watson
Defendant:
Charlie Thomas, Martin Wasielewski, Rebecca Brigman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
