Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Johnson v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Cheyanne Clark, Mark Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Queen Princess Anjaknie Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas, Elizabeth Queen, Andrew and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Jen Zarozi, Devin and others
SHOES et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
SHOES and M. Alicea X.
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Garner Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hasan v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Amin Hasan
Defendant:
Angel Quiros and Ned McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Ganim et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Respondent:
Joe Ganim, Michael C. Jankovsky, Roderick Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Armour v. Lamont
as 3:2023cv01606
Plaintiff:
Shaquan L Armour
Defendant:
Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. Lamont et al
as 3:2023cv01584
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Monroe
Defendant:
Ned Lamont and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of Governor Ned Lamont, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dobek et al v. Sansom et al
as 3:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
Irene Dobek and Clinton Prentice
Defendant:
Scott M Sansom, Michael Walsh and Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
