Cases 41 - 50 of 509
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Ltd. v. Netflix, Inc.
as 23-1750
Appellant:
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LIMITED
Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC.
Francisco Ferrero Rodriguez v. Netflix Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02302
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ferreras Rodriguez
Defendant:
Netflix Inc., Nolita Cinema, David M Rosenthal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Superprod v. Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02346
Plaintiff:
SUPERPROD
Defendant:
Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC and Does 1- 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wilson v. Netflix, Inc.
as 2:2023cv04058
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Wilson
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Xu Zhang v. Netflix, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02200
Plaintiff:
Xu Zhang
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ana Martinez v. Netflix, Inc., et al
as 23-10895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANA MARGARITA MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC., OLIVIER ASSAYAS and ORANGE STUDIOS, S.A.
Lovoi v. Barton et al
as 4:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Gerald Joseph Lovoi
Defendant:
Richard Barton, Rodolphe Belmer, Mathias Dopfner and others
Caleb L. McGillvary et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Caleb L. McGillvary
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Bunim Murray Productions, Jimmy Kimmel Live and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Woloszynska v. Netflix, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Katarzyna Woloszynska, Maja Woloszynska and Piotr Woloszynski
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc. and Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant:
Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
