Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Lindsey Marmont et al v. Bernzomatic Corp., et al
as 2:2016cv00848
Defendant:
Bernzomatic, Corp., Does, Irwin Industrial Tool Company and others
Plaintiff:
C. M., M. M., T. M. and others
Jason Logan Abell v. Worthington Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08427
Plaintiff:
Jason Logan Abell
Defendant:
Bernzomatic Inc., Does, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and others
Klimek et al v. Worthington Cylinders Wisconsin LLC et al
as 1:2015cv09373
Plaintiff:
Dariusz Klimek and Eric Rejdak
Defendant:
Worthington Cylinders Wisconsin LLC , Worthington Cylinder Corp. , Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. v. Bosgraaf et al
as 1:2015cv00597
Plaintiff:
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott T. Bosgraaf and Kirsch Lofts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
MANNERS v. NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC et al
as 4:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
TRACY MANNERS
Defendant:
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC , JALISA NIKOLA-BAUM and GRACO CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NWL, et al v. FlexFlo USA, Inc.
as 14-11920
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. and GRACO CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
FLEXFLO USA, INC.
NWL, et al v. FlexFlo USA, Inc.
as 14-11920
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. and GRACO CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
FLEXFLO USA, INC.
NOVOTNY v. NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC.
as 2:2014cv02553
Plaintiff:
STEVEN NOVOTNY
Defendant:
NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duncan v. Newell Window Furnishings, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv04038
Plaintiff:
Samantha Duncan
Defendant:
Newell Window Furnishings, Inc. and Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landmark Technology, LLC v. Newell Rubbermaid Inc.
as 6:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Landmark Technology, LLC
Defendant:
Newell Rubbermaid Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
