Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Nina Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Morgan v. Phillips et al
as 4:2023cv04063
Plaintiff:
Dr. Nina M. Morgan
Defendant:
Dana Phillips, Chief Deputy Cody Hensley, Sergeant Kristopher Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal - Civil Rights
Virden et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2023cv02071
Plaintiff:
Rebecka Virden, Samantha Rowlett and Nina Prater
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, County Judge Chris Keith, Quorum Court Member Robert Kevin Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Willard
as 3:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Edwin Bernard Smith
Defendant:
Nina Willard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Willard
as 5:2022cv05132
Plaintiff:
Edwin Bernard Smith
Defendant:
Lieutenant Nina Willard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Arkansas Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 4:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Victoria Smith and Charles Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Veterans Affairs, Cathy Lewis, Melissa Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Lane v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv00553
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Tasha Griffen, David A Ryles and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ruloph et al v. Horn
as 2:2017cv02155
Plaintiff:
Nina Ruloph and John Ruloph
Defendant:
Deborah Horn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Robins et al v. Wood
as 3:2017cv00227
Petitioner:
Helen Robins and Centennial Bank
Respondent:
Rena Wood
Movant:
Georgia Elizabeth Stiny Ratzenberger , Nina Ratzenberger , James Ratzenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
