Cases 1 - 8 of 8
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. BYRD et al
as 1:2026cv23135
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP and FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS INC
Defendant:
Cord Byrd, KIM BARTON, Christopher Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2026cv00147
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP and FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS INC
Defendant:
CORD BYRD, KIM BARTON, CHRISTOPHER MILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UnidosUS et al v. Byrd et al
as 1:2026cv22257
Plaintiff:
UnidosUS, League of Women Voters of Florida, League of Women Voters of Florida Education Fund and others
Defendant:
Cord Byrd, Joe Scott, Alina Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
FLORIDA DECIDES HEALTHCARE INC et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2025cv00211
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA DECIDES HEALTHCARE INC, MITCHELL EMERSON and JORDAN SIMMONS
Defendant:
CORD BYRD, JAMES UTHMEIER, KIM BARTON and others
Intervenor:
SMART & SAFE FLORIDA, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA EDUCATION FUND INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Theodate et al
as 1:2023cv10623
Plaintiff:
George Lamont White
Defendant:
Donald Theodate, Victor Maxwell, Cassandro Joseney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James May v. Dr. Nina Ward
as 12-7057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ANTHONY MAY
Defendant - Appellee:
NINA WARD and G. MULLEN
James May v. Nina Ward
as 11-7564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ANTHONY MAY
Defendant - Appellee:
NINA WARD and G. MULLEN
May v. Ward et al
as 5:2011ct03065
Plaintiff:
James Anthony May
Defendant:
Nina Ward and G. Mullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
