Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 223
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Norton v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00057
Petitioner: Joseph Hercules Norton
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norton v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00979
Petitioner: Joseph Hercules Norton
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norton v. Green et al
as 4:2024cv00929
Plaintiff: Joseph Hercules Norton
Defendant: David Green, Jerod Pingleton, Joe Marr Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Norton v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00268
Petitioner: Joseph Hercules Norton
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. Doe
as 5:2023cv00117
Plaintiff: Erik Flountez Gardner
Defendant: John Doe, Luke Henderson, Steve Rushing and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry NortonIn re: Larry Norton
as 23-40633
Petitioner: In re: Larry J. Norton
Norton et al v. American Western Home Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv01418
Plaintiff: Richard Norton and Mellisa Norton
Defendant: American Western Home Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Norton et al v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
as 3:2023cv01343
Plaintiff: Ronald Norton and Lana Norton
Defendant: Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?