Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sharon v. Harper et al
as 0:2025cv04603
Plaintiff:
Bazak Sharon
Defendant:
Nancy Sanders Harper, Sameer Gupta, Joseph Neglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez Rodriguez et al v. Harper et al
as 0:2025cv02266
Plaintiff:
Maria Alejandra Ramirez Rodriguez and Cristian Andres Guzman de la Ossa
Defendant:
Nancy Sanders Harper, Hennepin County, Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. Harper et al
as 0:2025cv00754
Plaintiff:
William Reynolds
Defendant:
Nancy Sanders Harper, University of Minnesota, The, Hennepin Healthcare System, Inc. doing business as Hennepin County Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANDERS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03599
Plaintiff:
NANCY SANDERS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANDERS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv20294
Plaintiff:
NANCY SANDERS and CHARLES SANDERS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanders v. Wyandot, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan et al
as 3:2015cv00601
Plaintiff:
Nancy Sanders
Defendant:
Wyandot, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan, Wyandot, Inc. and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mitchell v. Valdez et al
as 3:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
Charles H Mitchell
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, Walter Skinner, Nancy Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
