Cases 1 - 10 of 84
NAPP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23241
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GERARD NAPP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mayor v. Tharp et al
as 3:2023cv01347
Plaintiff:
Richard D Mayor
Defendant:
Chris Tharp, Captain Riding, Kyle Napp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Saintil v. Borough of Carteret, et al
as 22-2898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SAINTIL
Defendant / Appellee:
BOROUGH OF CARTERET, CARTERET POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON and others
Brandon McDermott v. Anna Moreno, et al
as 22-15718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON ALLEN MCDERMOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNA MORENO, Property Officer - Lewis Complex, BRIAN EVANS, Co. Account Movement, HIRST, First name unknown; Sergeant - Lewis Complex and others
NAPP et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY NAPP and PATRICIA NAPP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Duran v. Grelick, et al
as 22-1048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES J. DURAN, AKA James Joseph Duran
Defendant / Appellee:
GRELICK, Warden, DENHAM, Warden, MCCLINTOCK, Warden and others
Mihalic v. McDowell et al
as 3:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Mihalic, Sr.
Defendant:
McDowell, Josh Lumbar, Captain Nick Napp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Quintez Talley v. Keri Moore, et al
as 22-1307
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
KERI MOORE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Mihalic v. McDowell et al
as 5:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Mihalic, Sr.
Defendant:
Captain McDowell, Josh Lumbar, Captain Nick Napp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. County of Wayne et al
as 2:2021cv12742
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ward
Defendant:
County of Wayne, Robert Agacinski, Nancy Westveld and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
