Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Pettus v. White et al
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Alan Michael Pettus
Defendant:
Brent White, Sam Adams, Seth P'pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross-Blancke v. Flaiz et al
as 1:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Deborah Cross-Blancke
Defendant:
James R. Flaiz, Natalie E. Ray and Oscar E. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, et al v. Yost, et al
as 5:2021cv01614
Plaintiff:
Darrell H. Jones
Defendant:
Dave Yost
3Rd Party Defendant:
Mike DeWine, Natalie Haupt, Kyle L. Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sals v. Parker et al
as 2:2019cv02046
Defendant:
Natalie Voss and Tony Parker
Plaintiff:
Varquez Sals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Harris, et al.
as 2:2018cv02058
Plaintiff:
Prentiss Phillips
Defendant:
Patrick Harris, Elizabeth Watson, Famous Hurdle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson #146503 et al v. McPherson et al
as 1:2017cv00965
Plaintiff:
Paul Jackson #146503, Patrick McPherson, Norman Kuhn and others
Defendant:
Matt Swab, Joel Johnson, Billy Windom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cairns et al v. Malvasi et al
as 4:2017cv02215
Plaintiff:
Lewis Cairns and Natalie Mondary
Defendant:
Phillip Malvasi and Mary Schuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corum v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shane Corum
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Walter Stover, Kimberly Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Young v. Centurion, et al
as 17-5887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTURION, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, TDOC, JASON WOODALL, TDOC Deputy Commissioner of Operations and others
Crisp v. Corizan Medical Services Inc et al
as 2:2017cv12317
Plaintiff:
Maurice Crisp
Defendant:
Corizan Medical Services Inc, Michigan Department of Corrections, Velsicol Chemical Corp. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
